As a result of the competition, College Du Leman (Geneva, Switzerland) received the highest ranking.
Established in 1960, Du Leman College has been preparing students for admission to universities in the country and the world for more than fifty years. Its peculiarity is its adherence to strict academic standards and honoring traditions. At the same time, the college is relatively modern, possessing modern tools and equipment for practical work. The College has the following accreditations: European Council of International Schools (ECIS) and New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC).
Members of the competition jury invited by the Association are experienced experts in the educational environment:
– Mario Carbonelli.
- Country: Italy
- Mario Carbonelli is an Italian educator and psychologist who researches and develops innovative teaching methods in psychology and social pedagogy. His research focuses on the cognitive and emotional aspects of learning, improving student motivation, and solving psychological problems in educational environments.
– Nadia Bensaid.
- Country: France/Algeria
- Nadia Bensaid is an expert on education in multilingual and multicultural environments. Her research focuses on the integration of migrant and refugee children into educational systems and the development of pedagogical approaches to support social adaptation and equity.
-Kairat Mamiyev
- Country: Kazakhstan
- Kairat Mamiyev is an international business manager whose name is associated with professionalism and strategic thinking. His ability to adapt his business to dynamically changing conditions and implement innovative solutions has placed him among the leaders capable of overcoming any challenge of the modern economy. One key aspect of his management approach is his ability to find non-standard solutions in the face of global economic and political changes. His leadership skills have enabled him not only to address emerging challenges successfully but also to reach new levels of profitability.
-Anna Levin.
- Country: Sweden
- Anna Levine is an expert on inclusive education and social justice issues. She works with international organizations and governments to implement inclusive educational practices to remove barriers for students with special needs and from vulnerable social groups.
– Peter Mayer.
- Country: Germany
- Peter Meyer is a German educator and activist specializing in innovative educational approaches. These include developing students’ creativity and autonomy. Meyer also actively integrates technology into the educational process and develops programs for students with special needs.
– Erlan Usubakunov
- Country: Kyrgyzstan
- Erlan Usubakunov is an education expert, entrepreneur, and developer of a unique language teaching methodology. He is also a recognized mnemotechnics, teaching, child psychology, and personnel management expert. His methodology and business approach have significantly impacted the education market. As an expert, he actively develops standards in education, raises teachers’ qualifications, and forms successful educational practices actively copied and implemented by other institutions.
– Khalidu Mahmoud.
- Country: Nigeria
- Education: Education and social work
- Known for: Mahmoud is active in Nigeria, creating education programs for rural regions of the country. He develops educational projects to promote literacy and vocational training among the youth. His work aims to fight poverty through education.
– Yulia Gippenreiter (Yulia Gippenreiter)
- Country: Russia
- Education: Psychologist, Doctor of Psychology
- Known for: Yulia Hippenreiter is a Russian psychologist and educator. She has published popular books on the psychology of communication and child-rearing. She is known for her writings in pedagogy and psychology, especially in family education and children’s emotional intelligence development.
The evaluation conducted by the jury members of the Highest Pilot in Education was complex and comprehensive. The experts demonstrated exceptional attention to every aspect of educational organizations’ activities, considering both innovative potential and real value for educational practice. This made it possible to give a fair assessment and suggest directions for further improvement of educational initiatives.